1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Lada 2123
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,688 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lada 2123 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lada 2123 (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Lada 2123 | |
Make | Alpine | Lada |
Model | A 110 | 2123 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2460 mm |