1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1063 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Alpine A 110 | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 110 | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1638 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 71 L |
