1965 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 943 kg more than 1965 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Alpine A 110 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Alpine Ford
Model A 110 Mustang
Year Released 1965 2004
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 956 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 575 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1140 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2140 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 59 L