1965 Aston Martin DB5 vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Aston Martin DB5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Aston Martin DB5 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Aston Martin DB5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Aston Martin DB5 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1965 Aston Martin DB5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Aston Martin DB5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Aston Martin DB5 | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Aston Martin | Oldsmobile |
Model | DB5 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1965 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 314 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |