1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 40 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A 40 | M670 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2570 mm |
