1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer (67 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 135 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 40 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2350 mm |