1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1979 Fiat 128
To start off, 1979 Fiat 128 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Fiat 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Fiat 128 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Fiat 128 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Fiat 128 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 1979 Fiat 128 | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | 128 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1600 mm |