1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Fiat Vivace
To start off, 1982 Fiat Vivace is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Vivace (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Fiat Vivace weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Fiat Vivace (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Fiat Vivace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 1982 Fiat Vivace | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | Vivace |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1372 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 86.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 55.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2230 mm |