1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo

To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (129 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (180 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Austin A 40 1983 Fiat Ritmo
Make Austin Fiat
Model A 40 Ritmo
Year Released 1965 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 47 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 81 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 950 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2460 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]