1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1990 Daihatsu Mira
To start off, 1990 Daihatsu Mira is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Daihatsu Mira (62 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Daihatsu Mira should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 40 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1990 Daihatsu Mira.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Daihatsu Mira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 1990 Daihatsu Mira | |
| Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
| Model | A 40 | Mira |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 659 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 60.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2180 mm |
