1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 40 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Austin | MCC |
| Model | A 40 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
