1965 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 1997 Nissan El Grand is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | El Grand |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
