1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZR weights approximately 360 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Austin | MG |
Model | A 40 | ZR |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 65 L |