1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 495 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 490 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Austin | Pagani |
Model | A 40 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |