1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 681 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 40 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |