1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1189 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 40 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1949 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 78 L |