1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2011 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 40 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2700 mm |
