1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 410 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 40 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 40 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2550 mm |