1965 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1167 kg more than 1965 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 40 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 40 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1927 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |
