1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | 12 M |
Year Released | 1965 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |