1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 90 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 60 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
