1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 189 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3390 mm |
