1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1959 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1959 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 6380 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |
