1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 16 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 63 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 55 L |
