1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1965 Austin A 60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |
