1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1967 Innocenti C
To start off, 1967 Innocenti C is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1967 Innocenti C. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1967 Innocenti C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1967 Innocenti C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Innocenti C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Innocenti C. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Innocenti C.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1967 Innocenti C | |
Make | Austin | Innocenti |
Model | A 60 | C |
Year Released | 1965 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 28 L |