1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1971 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1971 Nissan Cedric is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Nissan Cedric (70 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 200 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Nissan Cedric (145 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1971 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1971 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 60 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
