1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1972 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1972 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Jaguar XJ (265 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 760 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1972 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | A 60 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 5344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 265 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 90 L |
