1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 30 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 60 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1965 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |