1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (90 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 60 | Century |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2662 mm |