1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 34 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 60 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |