1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1982 Fiat Panda is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1982 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 60 | Panda |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 652 cc |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2170 mm |