1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 60 | CJ7 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1305 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
