1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1984 Zastava 750
To start off, 1984 Zastava 750 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1984 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 60 | 750 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 33 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |