1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1985 Renault 9
To start off, 1985 Renault 9 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1985 Renault 9. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1985 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 1985 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 60 | 9 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 47 HP |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 38 L |
