1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |