1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1997 Alpina B 10
To start off, 1997 Alpina B 10 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alpina B 10 (340 HP) has 280 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alpina B 10 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alpina B 10 (471 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1997 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1997 Alpina B 10 | |
Make | Austin | Alpina |
Model | A 60 | B 10 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 4619 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 471 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3080 mm |