1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (150 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 460 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Austin | Acura |
Model | A 60 | CL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 65 L |