1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Citroen Xantia
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xantia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xantia (87 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xantia weights approximately 216 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xantia (200 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1999 Citroen Xantia | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 60 | Xantia |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 54 L |