1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (114 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 60 | Neon |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |