1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Almera (108 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 86 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Almera (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Almera |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |