1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 60 | Integra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |