1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (205 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 227 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (298 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2003 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 60 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 205 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 101.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 47 L |
