1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (151 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 60 | Liberty |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
