1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (187 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (281 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 60 | Viano |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 75 L |