1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 60 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Austin | Subaru |
Model | A 60 | R2 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 30 L |