1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 564 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 60 | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1684 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 71 L |
