1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 456 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 60 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |
