1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 60 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |