1965 Austin A 60 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin A 60 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 60 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
